1857.

third.-Brand new last anniversary out of Naga in Philippines girl beautiful Legal “Crown and Point” A.O.F. had been recognized by the a lunch at the Brother. Franklin’s, Hall Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood filled this new settee, also it are reported that the brand new Court then contained ninety members.

The month of january

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, R. Roentgen. B. Norman, Burton, and J. Bayly had been picked the new people in people Collection Committee.

p. 207 One’s body out-of an excellent whale, which had been drawn at the Winterton, had been showed toward Church Ordinary.

Brand new Rev. W. D. Go, the newest minister regarding St. Mary’s, Southtown, had, before you leave Southsea, started served with a handbag from ?61.

twenty-first.-The fresh “Sisters” got inside the accident with one of several stone piers out of the brand new Bridge, which it had more busted.

Feb. fourth.-An enthusiastic Anti-Taxation meeting had been held on Town Hallway. The fresh Mayor presided, additionally the pursuing the took part in what’s going on:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, R. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you will J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared to be the fresh mover contained in this matter.

Feb. 21st.-A “Poor’s Rate” conference ended up being held within Masonic Hallway. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and an answer protesting contrary to the 1s. 6d. every quarter rates are followed. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you can F. Starling spoke about the subject, just like the conduct of Guardians is actually defended of the Mr. J. H. Harrison, among the many Board.

Feb. 25th.-An incident hence delighted significant notice, ended up being read in the State Courtroom, Tolhouse-hall, before Legal (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The brand new plaintiff try Mr. John Cobb, fabric merchant, having which Mr. C. H. Chamberlin searched; brand new defendants was Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and you may Grams. D. Palmer, who had been depicted of the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. Brand new plaintiff stated that he had been a candidate towards work environment from Councillor to the e like at solicitation out-of Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you may Grams. D. Palmer. During the time he turned into a candidate the guy extremely informed them he wouldn’t spend from their own wallet far more than simply ?10 to the expenditures of your election, plus it are knew your Liberal group, to which he belonged, create sign up the remainder. The evening up until the election he gotten a quote away from just what the expense was basically apt to be, plus consequence of that he at once saw one another Mr. Burroughs and Mr. G. D. Palmer. You to imagine, the guy noticed, amounted to help you regarding the ?forty-five, as the memberships entirely amounted to help you however, ?42. After certain conversation it provided to keep your simple of number of the expenses which could surpass the sum of the subscribed, in which he and you will Mr. Burroughs next went p. 208 into the Committee-area of one’s Northern-ward, in which Mr. Burroughs said they’d generated agreements because of their buddy John Cobb successful the market-ward. The costs of one’s election, that he (the newest plaintiff) shed, amounted completely in order to ?58 1s. 7d. The balance, hence, that he now said from the defendants try ?sixteen 1s. 7d.-This new plaintiff, into the get across-test by the Mr. Cufaude, admitted you to definitely ?39 of your own entire amount are to own – -.-Mr. Cufaude debated that if, as the plaintiff mentioned, the fresh defendants got provided him a hope into the surplus expenses, the fresh new make sure need to are in creating. And you can, of course, if the evidence try genuine, and that, but not, the guy disputed, it was hopeless toward plaintiff to recuperate, inasmuch as he himself had anticipate that a large part out of the entire costs are to have – -, which was an unlawful act.-Mr. Chamberlin argued that the plaintiff, once searching the fresh hope throughout the defendants, acted simply upon the fresh new trust of that pledge, hence hence, as they had entered on an involvement to blow the cash, they were accountable. The cash, more over, had not been spent by the plaintiff, however, because of the committee appointed so you’re able to conduct the fresh new election, and you may until the election are more than, new plaintiff was not conscious that all money got come spent during the – -.-Their Honour said it actually was obvious the fresh guarantee should have been written down. He was of viewpoint, plus, that plaintiff wasn’t bound to afford the unlawful charge, and therefore he may not provide his action for money which he said.-New plaintiff try, accordingly, non-recommended.