The first thing that catches the attention is the relatively narrow and you can significant means the brand new letters are authored. New lines of your own ?, particularly, are so quick one to in-line 10 Roberts checks out good ? in lieu of an enthusiastic ?. In spite of the uncial handwriting, this new ? isn’t written including a capital Latin “M”, but rather is comparable to a couple of adjacent “1”s within the Latin cursive; the fresh new crossbar of ? is within the upper 3rd regarding the letter. New ?, like the ?, is really unusual and you may corresponds to an excellent Latin “V”, as the ? corresponds to an ugly “V”; common extension of your own best diagonal to the top left will not result. The fresh new ? include a couple independent pieces. There is an obvious gap between the vertical downstroke in addition to two diagonals, which are consumed in one sweep. This style of the newest ? is available, such, from inside the a good psalm fragment on the first half of this new 8th century, P.Amst. We 21 fourteen . This new crossbar of your own ? created quite high upwards is even used in a great liturgical schedule throughout the season 535/six, brand new P.Oxy. 1357 sixteen . The type of the brand new ? thereon papyrus in addition to is comparable to this new function found in P.Ryl. III 470. The ? in this papyrus, yet not, compared to P.Ryl. III 470, is written given that a continuous letter. The ? from inside the P.Oxy. 1357 has a beneficial diagonal stroke to reach the top leftover, throughout fragment P.Ryl. III 470 it is composed instance a good triangle. This new above mentioned variety of the fresh ?, an equivalent kind of the new ?, the above-stated form of the ? and you can a keen ? having furthermore short strokes can also be found from inside the P.Berol 13269, that’s assigned to the fresh seventh/eighth Century sixteen . P.Lond. 1817, dated regarding the 6th century, nonetheless alternates between the uncial while the above-mentioned form of the new ?, and you will parallels for the Manchester fragment exist for this new ? in addition to ?, given that gap between them components of new ? during the P. Lond. 1817 isn’t as high such as P.Ryl. III 470 17 . According to the relative texts cited, P.Ryl. III, 470 belongs between your 6th and you may seventh centuries. This new fifth century is actually unrealistic as date out of provider, but can not be totally ruled-out. The employment of brown ink, of which there’s no facts prior to the last century, including items in this recommendations 18 .
In summary it may be asserted that a matchmaking with the third otherwise last century need to be regarded as very improbable
thirteen. During the comes to an end of shots out-of ?, ?, ?, ?, and ? try brief specks of ink that provides the written text a fake, otherwise, as the Lobel place it, decorative appearance. Getting a comparable occurrence when you look at the phenomenal messages, cf. p. seven col. 17; pt ten; p. thirty-six col. 2; P. thirty-six Col. 7 during the: K. Klassendanz, Papyri Graecae Magicae. Die griechischen Zauberpapyri (=The fresh Greek Magical Papyri) II, Stuttgart next ed. 1974.
In terms of paleographic dating, it should be detailed that majuscule manuscripts, given that Roberts himself produces in the responses, are tough to time
18. I am with debt so you’re able to H. Harrauer toward discussion. Get a hold of plus V. Gardthausen, Griechische Palaographie step 1: Das Buchwesen i will be Altertum und auch im byzantinischen Mittelalter, Leipzig next ed. 1911, 203-217. The guy produces (p.205) one to within the fifth century Advertising “a brownish, in addition to steel ink arrived to play with” and you may prices Schubart contained in this context within the mention 5 with the same page, just who speaks of a brown-red-ink , which can be found on papyri on next century Advertising. At the same time, the greater valuable brown ink was only employed for very important texts.
